- The flattening of the curve we are seeing now is due to the most vulnerable dying first as much as the lockdown
- UK policy on lockdown and in other European countries is not evidence-based
- The correct policy is to protect the old and the frail only
- This will eventually lead to herd immunity as a “by-product”
- The initial UK response, before the “180 degree U-turn”, was better
- The Imperial College paper was “not very good” and he has never seen an unpublished, non-peer-reviewed paper have so much policy impact
- Is dismissive of the 510,000 figure that was predicted if mitigation measures were not implemented
- The Imperial College paper was much too pessimistic and did not factor in the now much increased ICU capacity
- Any such models are a dubious basis for public policy anyway, taking no account of real world specifics
- The results will eventually be similar for all countries
- Covid-19 is a “mild disease” and similar to the flu, and it was the novelty of the disease that scared people.
- The actual fatality rate of Covid-19 will in all likelihood turn out to be in the region of 0.1%
- At least 50% of the population of both the UK and Sweden will likely be shown to have already had the disease when mass antibody testing becomes available
Saturday, 18 April 2020
Swedish Epidemiologist Lays Out Sweden’s Thinking
Guido Fawkes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment