Electroverse
We urgently need to expose the ‘CO2 = pollutant’ fallacy
being forced upon your children, grandchildren, nephews and nieces by
schools, universities, governments and mainstream media worldwide, and
to denounce it in scrupulously truthful terms easily understood by the
public, including those youngsters themselves.
Here are the 25 bullet points proving CO2’s innocence:
Monday 24 June 2019
Political correctness is about control and authority
Sky News
"Political correctness is about control and authority. It is a political tool design to determine precisely one course of action, one set of ideas. It tells us what we must do." (A Must See)
https://twitter.com/SkyNewsAust/status/1142577289504292864
"Political correctness is about control and authority. It is a political tool design to determine precisely one course of action, one set of ideas. It tells us what we must do." (A Must See)
https://twitter.com/SkyNewsAust/status/1142577289504292864
Monday 13 May 2019
The Global War on Christians in the Muslim World
Newsweek
The portrayal of Muslims as victims or heroes is at best partially accurate. In recent years the violent oppression of Christian minorities has become the norm in Muslim-majority nations stretching from West Africa and the Middle East to South Asia and Oceania. In some countries it is governments and their agents that have burned churches and imprisoned parishioners. In others, rebel groups and vigilantes have taken matters into their own hands, murdering Christians and driving them from regions where their roots go back centuries.
The media’s reticence on the subject no doubt has several sources. One may be fear of provoking additional violence. Another is most likely the influence of lobbying groups such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation—a kind of United Nations of Islam centered in Saudi Arabia—and the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Over the past decade, these and similar groups have been remarkably successful in persuading leading public figures and journalists in the West to think of each and every example of perceived anti-Muslim discrimination as an expression of a systematic and sinister derangement called “Islamophobia”—a term that is meant to elicit the same moral disapproval as xenophobia or homophobia."
"Instead of falling for overblown tales of Western Islamophobia, let’s take a real stand against the Christophobia infecting the Muslim world. Tolerance is for everyone—except the intolerant."
The portrayal of Muslims as victims or heroes is at best partially accurate. In recent years the violent oppression of Christian minorities has become the norm in Muslim-majority nations stretching from West Africa and the Middle East to South Asia and Oceania. In some countries it is governments and their agents that have burned churches and imprisoned parishioners. In others, rebel groups and vigilantes have taken matters into their own hands, murdering Christians and driving them from regions where their roots go back centuries.
The media’s reticence on the subject no doubt has several sources. One may be fear of provoking additional violence. Another is most likely the influence of lobbying groups such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation—a kind of United Nations of Islam centered in Saudi Arabia—and the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Over the past decade, these and similar groups have been remarkably successful in persuading leading public figures and journalists in the West to think of each and every example of perceived anti-Muslim discrimination as an expression of a systematic and sinister derangement called “Islamophobia”—a term that is meant to elicit the same moral disapproval as xenophobia or homophobia."
"Instead of falling for overblown tales of Western Islamophobia, let’s take a real stand against the Christophobia infecting the Muslim world. Tolerance is for everyone—except the intolerant."
Friday 5 April 2019
BATTLE FOR BREXIT: Today should have been historic, but it’s shambolic
Express
The stalemate at Westminster represents an appalling betrayal of the British people. In the EU referendum of June 23, 2016 – 1009 day ago – after the biggest democratic exercise in our history, the electorate sent a simple instruction to our rulers.
The stalemate at Westminster represents an appalling betrayal of the British people. In the EU referendum of June 23, 2016 – 1009 day ago – after the biggest democratic exercise in our history, the electorate sent a simple instruction to our rulers.
But they have disgracefully failed to act on that mandate. Our country is no nearer to leaving now than it was in 2016.
Almost three years have been wasted in enfeebled negotiations, procedural games and continual procrastination.
Just think of the outrage if the roles had been reversed. Imagine if the Remain campaign had won the referendum, then Parliament had decided to ignore the verdict and gone ahead with our withdrawal from the EU.
Such a scenario might seem absurd, but it is exactly what the establishment is now doing with Brexit. ....
But the biggest culprits of all are the Remainers, who have simply refused to accept the outcome of the 2016 referendum.
In their arrogant disdain for the will of the people, they are the prime architects of the present fiasco."
Almost three years have been wasted in enfeebled negotiations, procedural games and continual procrastination.
Just think of the outrage if the roles had been reversed. Imagine if the Remain campaign had won the referendum, then Parliament had decided to ignore the verdict and gone ahead with our withdrawal from the EU.
Such a scenario might seem absurd, but it is exactly what the establishment is now doing with Brexit. ....
But the biggest culprits of all are the Remainers, who have simply refused to accept the outcome of the 2016 referendum.
In their arrogant disdain for the will of the people, they are the prime architects of the present fiasco."
How did we end up in this Brexit mess? Two words – Theresa May
Express
It is hard, nay impossible, to deny we are witnessing the last days of the worst premiership in living memory, perhaps for centuries ...
It is hard, nay impossible, to deny we are witnessing the last days of the worst premiership in living memory, perhaps for centuries ...
Mrs May brought all her disasters on herself – and on us.
There was no reason for the snap election, but once it was called there was no need for the appalling manifesto or catastrophic campaign.
Having frittered away a clear poll lead and secured a hung parliament, the lady turned her zero talents to negotiating our people-mandated Brexit.
She had access to brilliant negotiators but rebuffed them all. She appointed David Davis and Dominic Raab as Brexit ministers, then undermined them until they had no choice but to resign. Then she negotiated herself, aided and manipulated by her personal guru, the bureaucrat Olly Robbins. ....
There was nothing she touched that did not develop into a self-inflicted disaster. ......
The two words "No Deal" have been successfully demonised by the civil service (100 percent), the MPs (70 percent) and the media (50 percent).
You might think it was a thermonuclear bomb over the Home Counties.
It is only the switching from one framework of trading rules (EU) to the global alternative World trade Organisation (WTO) rules.
With preparation that would take a week of dislocation.
As not one hour was spent on preparation over two years, it will take most of the summer. But once the soul-destroying chaos is gone, our ever-ingenious traders will get the job done and get on with our new journey to prosperity under our own flag and laws. "
There was no reason for the snap election, but once it was called there was no need for the appalling manifesto or catastrophic campaign.
Having frittered away a clear poll lead and secured a hung parliament, the lady turned her zero talents to negotiating our people-mandated Brexit.
She had access to brilliant negotiators but rebuffed them all. She appointed David Davis and Dominic Raab as Brexit ministers, then undermined them until they had no choice but to resign. Then she negotiated herself, aided and manipulated by her personal guru, the bureaucrat Olly Robbins. ....
There was nothing she touched that did not develop into a self-inflicted disaster. ......
The two words "No Deal" have been successfully demonised by the civil service (100 percent), the MPs (70 percent) and the media (50 percent).
You might think it was a thermonuclear bomb over the Home Counties.
It is only the switching from one framework of trading rules (EU) to the global alternative World trade Organisation (WTO) rules.
With preparation that would take a week of dislocation.
As not one hour was spent on preparation over two years, it will take most of the summer. But once the soul-destroying chaos is gone, our ever-ingenious traders will get the job done and get on with our new journey to prosperity under our own flag and laws. "
The PM has gone totally rogue simply in order to secure her legacy
Cllr Molly Giles
"In simple terms the PM has gone totally rogue simply in order to secure her legacy and her deal which is so unpopular with her own party, her own voter and those who voted to Leave. She must be removed forthwith. Cabinet, Ministers and MPs must act."
"In simple terms the PM has gone totally rogue simply in order to secure her legacy and her deal which is so unpopular with her own party, her own voter and those who voted to Leave. She must be removed forthwith. Cabinet, Ministers and MPs must act."
Treacherous Theresa May has surrendered our freedom… and her honour
The Sun
She has wriggled. She has lied. She has concealed and dithered and caved. She is a freaking disaster.
The tragedy is that it need not have been like this.
Even on Tuesday afternoon, while she was having that seven-hour meeting with her Cabinet, she could have saved herself and our country. .......
And yet No Deal could have been brilliant.
It could have secured us our independence from a European Union that now is sucking us back into its prison.
No Deal would have served our children’s interests because we would not have had to pay £39billion to Europe and because we would have been able to forge our own way in the world.
The ensuing instability might only have lasted a few weeks, if that.
Mrs May would not consider it. She collapsed like over- watered jelly, listening to dodgy Whitehall chief Sir Mark Sedwill and his (leaked) alarmist tales about what No Deal might do to our economy....Worst of all has been our parliament, where Remainer MPs and peers and a blatantly biased Speaker have actively sought to block the referendum verdict of 17.4million voters — a verdict they had repeatedly promised to respect. ......"
She has wriggled. She has lied. She has concealed and dithered and caved. She is a freaking disaster.
The tragedy is that it need not have been like this.
Even on Tuesday afternoon, while she was having that seven-hour meeting with her Cabinet, she could have saved herself and our country. .......
And yet No Deal could have been brilliant.
It could have secured us our independence from a European Union that now is sucking us back into its prison.
No Deal would have served our children’s interests because we would not have had to pay £39billion to Europe and because we would have been able to forge our own way in the world.
The ensuing instability might only have lasted a few weeks, if that.
Mrs May would not consider it. She collapsed like over- watered jelly, listening to dodgy Whitehall chief Sir Mark Sedwill and his (leaked) alarmist tales about what No Deal might do to our economy....Worst of all has been our parliament, where Remainer MPs and peers and a blatantly biased Speaker have actively sought to block the referendum verdict of 17.4million voters — a verdict they had repeatedly promised to respect. ......"
Tuesday 26 March 2019
Theresa May has moved beyond dishonesty to despotism
TCW
...The law she is now evading is the EU Withdrawal Act of June 2018. It is an act of many parts, but more on those later. One part effectively ratifies the international commitment that May triggered in March 2017 by petitioning to leave the EU under Article 50 of the EU constitution (the Treaty on European Union). Since Article 50 provides for two years between petition and separation, Britain is scheduled to leave the EU on 29 March at midnight Brussels time (2300 hours British time). The EU Withdrawal Act effectively ratifies that timing. ........................
May might insist that urgency trumps legislation; the Remainer-dominated Parliament might act executively for itself; the EU has normalised the enforcement of only convenient interpretations.
However, the Remainers’ extra-constitutionality serves Brexiteers too. If Remainers don’t need to follow the law for Brexit on 29 March, then Brexiteers can repudiate May’s stupid and unratified agreements with the EU.
The EU could sue Britain in the EU’s own court for a breach of international agreement, but that would just confirm the case for Britain to regain its national sovereignty – and the best way to do that is to confirm the EU Withdrawal Act’s repeal of EU jurisdiction."
...The law she is now evading is the EU Withdrawal Act of June 2018. It is an act of many parts, but more on those later. One part effectively ratifies the international commitment that May triggered in March 2017 by petitioning to leave the EU under Article 50 of the EU constitution (the Treaty on European Union). Since Article 50 provides for two years between petition and separation, Britain is scheduled to leave the EU on 29 March at midnight Brussels time (2300 hours British time). The EU Withdrawal Act effectively ratifies that timing. ........................
May might insist that urgency trumps legislation; the Remainer-dominated Parliament might act executively for itself; the EU has normalised the enforcement of only convenient interpretations.
However, the Remainers’ extra-constitutionality serves Brexiteers too. If Remainers don’t need to follow the law for Brexit on 29 March, then Brexiteers can repudiate May’s stupid and unratified agreements with the EU.
The EU could sue Britain in the EU’s own court for a breach of international agreement, but that would just confirm the case for Britain to regain its national sovereignty – and the best way to do that is to confirm the EU Withdrawal Act’s repeal of EU jurisdiction."
Andy Bird
May’s deal ENSURES we will remain under the EU’s control including Commission, Parliament and ECJ as EU will control our external trade policy, all our food, all our goods, all our fisheries and all our farming. If we don’t “agree” they will put us into the backstop until we do.
May’s deal ENSURES we will remain under the EU’s control including Commission, Parliament and ECJ as EU will control our external trade policy, all our food, all our goods, all our fisheries and all our farming. If we don’t “agree” they will put us into the backstop until we do.
Sunday 17 March 2019
Prime Minister, you will be held responsible if Brexit is not delivered as you pledged
Brexit Central
The following is an open letter to Theresa May from Cllr Bob Perry and a host of other Conservative Party activists (as listed at the bottom)
Dear Prime Minister,
We write to you in an absolute state of despair as to what is happening to democracy in this once great country of ours. We use the term “once great” as that is how we will be viewed, going forward on the world stage, if the will of the people is not implemented in full by leaving the European Union on 29th March 2019, as directed by the people on 23rd June 2016.
We understand and respect your strong desire to leave with a deal, your deal; but may we politely remind you that the British people did not vote for a deal – they voted to Leave.
When you took office you stood outside Number 10 and stated loudly that “Brexit means Brexit”. The British people expect you to honour that pledge. Failure to do so is a denial of democracy itself and you personally will be held responsible for that great act of betrayal.
The events of the past few days have shown the utter contempt in which parliamentarians hold the people. The relentless attempts to cancel Brexit by any means is shameful and deplorable. Vote after vote, amendment after amendment, are all based around denying the British people the independence for which they they voted. The mere thought that a Conservative Government, led by you, could put forward an amendment to delay Article 50, effectively denying the will of the people, is unforgivable."
The following is an open letter to Theresa May from Cllr Bob Perry and a host of other Conservative Party activists (as listed at the bottom)
Dear Prime Minister,
We write to you in an absolute state of despair as to what is happening to democracy in this once great country of ours. We use the term “once great” as that is how we will be viewed, going forward on the world stage, if the will of the people is not implemented in full by leaving the European Union on 29th March 2019, as directed by the people on 23rd June 2016.
We understand and respect your strong desire to leave with a deal, your deal; but may we politely remind you that the British people did not vote for a deal – they voted to Leave.
When you took office you stood outside Number 10 and stated loudly that “Brexit means Brexit”. The British people expect you to honour that pledge. Failure to do so is a denial of democracy itself and you personally will be held responsible for that great act of betrayal.
The events of the past few days have shown the utter contempt in which parliamentarians hold the people. The relentless attempts to cancel Brexit by any means is shameful and deplorable. Vote after vote, amendment after amendment, are all based around denying the British people the independence for which they they voted. The mere thought that a Conservative Government, led by you, could put forward an amendment to delay Article 50, effectively denying the will of the people, is unforgivable."
SECRET documents reveal plans for Britain to RE- ENTER EU in 2020!
unitynewsnetwork
"On Monday July 9th 2018, several leading French, German and Dutch senior managers were called by EU officials to an urgent meeting.
The meeting was said to be private and those present were informed that Prime Minister May and Chancellor Merkel had reached an Agreement over Brexit. Knowledge of this was attained from the actual transcript of the meeting between May and Merkel.
1) The Agreement was couched in a way to ‘appease’ the Brexit voters.
2) The Agreement would enable May to get rid of those people in her party who were against progress and unity in the EU.
3) Both Merkel and May agreed that the likely course of events would be that UK would re-join the EU in full at some time after the next general election.
4) May agreed to keep as many EU laws and institutions as she could despite the current groundswell of ‘anti-EU hysteria’ in Britain (May’s own words, apparently.)
5) Merkel and May agreed that the only realistic future for the UK was within the EU.
The original Agreement draft was completed in May 2018 in Berlin and then sent to the UK Government Cabinet Office marked ‘Secret’.
NB This Agreement draft was authored in the German Chancellor’s private office.
The Cabinet returned the Agreement draft with suggestions, and there was some to-ing and fro-ing during June 5th 2018.
Private calls between the Prime Minister and Chancellor were made.
The Agreement’s final draft came out late in June 2018. The German Chancellor told Prime Minister May that this was a deal she would support, though there would need to be some more small concessions by the UK to keep the EU happy.
The Chancellor and Prime Minister met in Germany. Merkel had this meeting recorded as a ‘private meeting’ though the Prime Minister was probably unaware of that.
The Chancellor had the transcript of that meeting circulated secretly to EU and key German embassies.
Conclusions
Documents make it quite clear that Prime Minister May was negotiating with Germany, not the EU.
The transcript also makes it clear that the Prime Minister intended to keep all this secret from minsters, especially the Brexit group.
She wants to keep as many EU institutions in UK as intact as possible in order to facilitate an easy return to the EU after 2020.
Chancellor Merkel briefed May on tactics to force Cabinet approval.
The Prime Minister and senior civil servants were working with Germany to stop Brexit or water it down to prevent free trade and the ending of freedom of movement, but to keep cash flowing to the EU.
David Davis was kept in the dark while key EU premiers in France, Holland and Ireland were briefed in full.
Key EU heads were actually briefed in full the day before the Cabinet meeting at Chequers."
"On Monday July 9th 2018, several leading French, German and Dutch senior managers were called by EU officials to an urgent meeting.
The meeting was said to be private and those present were informed that Prime Minister May and Chancellor Merkel had reached an Agreement over Brexit. Knowledge of this was attained from the actual transcript of the meeting between May and Merkel.
1) The Agreement was couched in a way to ‘appease’ the Brexit voters.
2) The Agreement would enable May to get rid of those people in her party who were against progress and unity in the EU.
3) Both Merkel and May agreed that the likely course of events would be that UK would re-join the EU in full at some time after the next general election.
4) May agreed to keep as many EU laws and institutions as she could despite the current groundswell of ‘anti-EU hysteria’ in Britain (May’s own words, apparently.)
5) Merkel and May agreed that the only realistic future for the UK was within the EU.
The original Agreement draft was completed in May 2018 in Berlin and then sent to the UK Government Cabinet Office marked ‘Secret’.
NB This Agreement draft was authored in the German Chancellor’s private office.
The Cabinet returned the Agreement draft with suggestions, and there was some to-ing and fro-ing during June 5th 2018.
Private calls between the Prime Minister and Chancellor were made.
The Agreement’s final draft came out late in June 2018. The German Chancellor told Prime Minister May that this was a deal she would support, though there would need to be some more small concessions by the UK to keep the EU happy.
The Chancellor and Prime Minister met in Germany. Merkel had this meeting recorded as a ‘private meeting’ though the Prime Minister was probably unaware of that.
The Chancellor had the transcript of that meeting circulated secretly to EU and key German embassies.
Conclusions
Documents make it quite clear that Prime Minister May was negotiating with Germany, not the EU.
The transcript also makes it clear that the Prime Minister intended to keep all this secret from minsters, especially the Brexit group.
She wants to keep as many EU institutions in UK as intact as possible in order to facilitate an easy return to the EU after 2020.
Chancellor Merkel briefed May on tactics to force Cabinet approval.
The Prime Minister and senior civil servants were working with Germany to stop Brexit or water it down to prevent free trade and the ending of freedom of movement, but to keep cash flowing to the EU.
David Davis was kept in the dark while key EU premiers in France, Holland and Ireland were briefed in full.
Key EU heads were actually briefed in full the day before the Cabinet meeting at Chequers."
800 years of democracy is unravelling before our very eyes: Distinguished historian DAVID STARKEY on how our self-satisfied politicians have launched a coup over Brexit
Daily Mail
"But I ended on a note of caution. All is
not well with Britain or our politics, I said. ‘Is it silly to think
there is a touch of 1215 – a whiff of revolution – in the air?
And
it came true in June 2016, with the decisive referendum vote to reshape
our politics once again and leave the European Union.
The
referendum was a very British revolution. And it’s been followed by a
very British counter-revolution, which shows every sign of succeeding.
Don't
be deceived by the lack of violence or the comparative good manners of
those now seizing control. This is a coup, and what is at stake is the
nature and legitimacy of Parliament itself.
Ruled
by comfortable, smug elites, Parliament is choosing to ignore the
ordinary British people as they attempt to hold power to account.
It is no exaggeration to say that British democracy, which stands in direct line with Magna Carta, is now unravelling before us.
If
today’s self-satisfied MPs and Ministers – I have already described
them as a Parliament of Pygmies – have no time for the voters, they have
little time for history, either."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)