Luboš Motl's Reference Frame
At the end, the "Fact Check" label is a recipe or preparation for the
censorship done by someone else. Some users of the Google News service
are encouraged to only pick the officially "Fact-Checked" news. So from
the viewpoint of those parties' readers, the non-Fact-Checked or
negatively Fact-Checked articles are being censored. Is that really a
good idea? Are you really sure that they can't convey an important idea
or information that the people should be exposed to? Can't you see that
due to the systematic collective bias of the self-appointed fact
checkers, news being filtered in this way are becoming distorted as
It often looks to me that the left-wing media and their ideological
soulmates are trying to restore the regime of the "only allowed opinion"
that we have known in the totalitarian countries. But what these
leftards are missing is that people in totalitarian societies were forced to behave as if they believed all the cr*p by aggressive sanctions, firing from jobs, and even prisons (and uranium mines).
Hillary's aßlickers, Google, and others: You just haven't conquered the
full control over the citizens to the same extent to which the
totalitarian machineries have done it. So you simply shouldn't expect
that the result will be the same "unity of opinions" that was present in
the totalitarian societies. Instead, Google may at most downgrade
itself from a company that invented a great impartial algorithm to rate
and order pages in the search pages to another company composed of
And that would be a truly sad case of degeneration because Google has done some great things.
Please, don't try to harm a particular candidate in the elections by
these tricks and stop collaborating with all those whose self-evident
goal is to do so. They're not honest, they're not impartial, they're not
really more careful than others, they're not nice, and they are
crippling your business. Thanks for your understanding, Google."